Monday, February 28, 2005

Starbuck: Lost in Castration

From Dreamwatch Magazine
Once upon a time, in what used to be a far away land called Hollywood but is now a state of mind and everywhere, a young actor was handed a script and asked to bring to life a character called Starbuck. I am that actor. The script was called Battlestar Galactica.

Fortunately I was young, my imagination fertile and adrenal glands strong, because bringing Starbuck to life was over the dead imaginations of a lot of Network Executives. Every character trait I struggled to give him was met with vigorous resistance. A charming womanizer? The "Suits" (Network Executives) hated it. A cigar (fumerello) smoker? The Suits hated it. A reluctant hero who found humour in the bleakest of situations? The Suits hated it. All this negative feedback convinced me I was on the right track.

Starbuck was meant to be a loveable rogue. It was best for the show, best for the character and the best that I could do. The Suits didn't think so. "One more cigar and he's fired,"they told Glen Larson, the creator of the show. "We want Starbuck to appeal to the female audience for crying out loud!" You see, the Suits knew women were turned off by men who smoked cigars. Especially young men. (How they "knew" this was never revealed.) And they didn't stop there. "If Dirk doesn't quit playing every scene with a girl like he wants to get her in bed, he's fired!" This was, well, it was blatant heterosexuality. Treating women like "sex objects". I thought it was flirting. Never mind. They wouldn't have it.

I wouldn't have it any other way, or rather Starbuck wouldn't. So we persevered, Starbuck and I. The show, as the saying goes, went on and the rest is history – for, lo and behold, women from all over the world sent me boxes of cigars, phone numbers, dinner requests, marriage proposals... The Suits were not impressed. They would have there way, which is what Suits do best, and after one season of puffing and flirting and gambling, Starbuck, that loveable scoundrel, was indeed fired. Which is to say Battlestar Galactica was cancelled. Starbuck however, would not stay cancelled, but simply morphed into another flirting, cigar-smoking, blatant heterosexual called Faceman Another show, another set of Suits and, of course, if the A-Team movie rumours prove correct, another remake.

There was a time – I know I was there – when men were men, women were women and sometimes a cigar was just a good smoke. But 40 years of feminism have taken their toll. The war against masculinity has been won. Everything has turned into its opposite, so that what was once flirting and smoking is now sexual harassment and criminal. And everyone is more lonely and miserable as a result.

Witness the "re-imagined" Battlestar Galactica. It's bleak, miserable, despairing, angry and confused. Which is to say, it reflects, in microcosm, the complete change in the politics and mores of today's world as opposed to the world of yesterday. The world of Lorne Greene (Adama) and Fred Astaire (Starbuck's Poppa), and Dirk Benedict (Starbuck). I would guess Lorne is glad he's in that Big Bonanza in the sky and well out of it. Starbuck, alas, has not been so lucky. He's not been left to pass quietly into that trivial world of cancelled TV characters.

"Re-imagining", they call it. "un-imagining" is more accurate. To take what once was and twist it into what never was intended. So that a television show based on hope, spiritual faith, and family is unimagined and regurgitated as a show of despair, sexual violence and family dysfunction. To better reflect the times of ambiguous morality in which we live, one would assume. A show in which the aliens (Cylons) are justified in their desire to destroy our civilization. One would assume. Indeed, let us not say who are he guys and who are the bad. That is being "judgemental". And that kind of (simplistic) thinking went out with Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan and Katharine Hepburn and John Wayne and, well the original Battlestar Galactica.

In the bleak and miserable, "re-imagined" world of Battlestar Galactica, things are never that simple. Maybe the Cylons are not evil and alien but in fact enlightened and evolved? Let us not judge them so harshly. Maybe it is they who deserve to live and Adama, and his human ilk who deserves to die? And what a way to go! For the re-imagined terrorists (Cylons) are not mechanical robots void of soul, of sexuality, but rather humanoid six-foot-tall former lingerie models who f**k you to death. (Poor old Starbuck, you were imagined to early. Think of the fun you could have had `fighting' with these thong-clad aliens! In the spirit of such soft-core sci-fi porn I think a more re-imaginative title would have been F**cked by A Cylon. (Apologies to Touched by An Angel.)

One thing is certain. In the new un-imagined, re-imagined world of Battlestar Galactica everything is female driven. The male characters, from Adama on down, are confused, weak, and wracked with indecision while the female characters are decisive, bold, angry as hell, puffing cigars (gasp) and not about to take it any more.

One can quickly surmise what a problem the original Starbuck created for the re-imaginators. Starbuck was all charm and humour and flirting without an angry bone in his womanising body. Yes, he was definitely `female driven', but not in the politically correct ways of Re-imagined Television. What to do, wondered the Re-imaginators? Keep him as he was, with a twinkle in his eye, a stogie in his mouth, a girl in every galaxy? This could not be. He would stick out like, well like a jock strap in a drawer of thongs. Starbuck refused to be re-imagined. It became the Great Dilemma. How to have your Starbuck and delete him too?

The best minds in the world of un-imagination doubled their intake of Double Soy Lattes as they gathered in their smoke-free offices to curse the day this chauvinistic Viper Pilot was allowed to be. But never under estimate the power of the un-imaginative mind when it encounters an obstacle (character) it subconsciously loathes. "Re-inspiration" struck. Starbuck would go the way of most men in today's society. Starbuck would become "Stardoe". What the Suits of yesteryear had been incapable of doing to Starbuck 25 years ago was accomplished quicker than you can say orchiectomy. Much quicker. As in, "Frak! Gonads Gone!" And the word went out to all the Suits in all the smoke-free offices throughout the land of Un-imagination, "Starbuck is dead. Long live Stardoe!"

I'm not sure if a cigar in the mouth of Stardoe resonates in the same way it did in the mouth of Starbuck. Perhaps. Perhaps it "resonates" more. Perhaps that's the point. I'm not sure. What I am sure of is this…

Women are from Venus. Men are from Mars. Hamlet does not scan as Hamletta. Nor does Han Solo as Han Sally. Faceman is not the same as Facewoman. Nor does a Stardoe a Starbuck make. Men hand out cigars. Women `hand out' babies. And thus the world, for thousands of years,
has gone round.

I am also sure that Show Business has been morphing for many decades now and has finally become Biz Business. The creative artists have lost and the Suits have won. Suits. Administrators. Technocrats. Metro-sexual money-men (and women) who create formulas to guarantee profit margins. Because movies and television shows are not made to enlighten or even entertain but simply to make money. They will tell you it is (still) about story and character but all it is really about is efficiency. About The Formula. Because Harvard Business School Technocrats run Hollywood and what Technocrats know is what must be removed from all business is Risk. And I tell you life, real life, is all about risk. I tell you that without risk you have no creativity, no art. I tell you that without risk you have Remakes. You have Charlie's Angels, The Saint, Mission Impossible, The A-Team (coming soon) Battlestar Galactica. All risk-free brand names, franchises.

For you see, TV Shows (and movies) are made and sold according to the same business formula as hamburger franchises. So that it matters not if the `best' hamburger, what matters is that you `think' it is the best. And you do think it's the best, because you have been told to; because all of your favourite celebrities are seen munching it on TV. The big money is not spent on making the hamburger or the television show, but on the marketing of the hamburger/show. (One 60-second commercial can cost more than it does to film a one-hour episode.) It matters not to Suits if it is Starbuck or Stardoe, if the Cylons are robots or lingerie models, if the show is full of optimism and morality or pessimism and amorality. What matters is that it is marketed well, so that all you people out there in TV land know that you must see this show. And after you see it, you are told that you should like it. That it is new and bold and sleek and sexy and best of all… it is Re-imagined!

So grab a Coke from the fridge (not the Classic Coke, but the re-imagined kind with fewer calories) and send out for a McDonald's Hamburger (the re-imagined one with fewer carbs) and tune in to Stardoe and Cylon #6 (or was it #69?) and Enjoy The Show.

And if you don't enjoy the show, or the hamburger and coke, it's not the fault of those re-imaginative technocrats that brought them to you. It is your fault. You and your individual instincts, tastes, judgement. Your refusal to let go of the memory of the show that once was. You just don't know what is good for you. But stay tuned. After another 13 episodes (and millions of dollar of marketing), you will see the light. You, your instincts, your judgement, are wrong. McDonald's is the best hamburger on the planet, Coca-Cola the best drink. Stardoe is the best Viper Pilot in the Galaxy. And Battlestar Galactica, contrary to what your memory tells you, never existed before the Re-imagination of 2003.

I disagree. But perhaps, you had to be there.

Dirk Benedict, writing in Dreamwatch, May 2004

Definitely an interesting take on the new series...

Best Trailer Evar!!!

You must download this right now
[Listening to: The Pogues - Hell's Ditch - Summer in Siam (4:04)]

Words of wisdom

There are words to remember.
Rather than let them alarm you, ask yourself this: do you think people who can't tell you whether it will rain next Wednesday are really capable of building models that tell you what the climate will be like 100 years from now? I wouldn't trust any economic modelling that forecast what the world economy would look like a century hence, and climate models are at least as flawed as economists' ones.

More here

Sunday, February 27, 2005

*sigh* Apple fanatics, WTF is wrong with you?

Right Thoughts: "*sigh* Apple fanatics, WTF is wrong with you?"

Frankly Apple fanatics have always been a little strange. No more so than this guy. For starters, there lego figures not Minifigs (whatever the heck they are). Secondly - they guy who makes them - people with one name are always a little strange. Thirdly - his second figure - at $US17 a pop, sold out in 36 minutes. What a racket...


Look - freaking Lego painted black. And people pay money for this...

Wrong. Simply Wrong.

So, we're playing Trivial Pursuit 20th Anniversary Edition and we had accross this question:

Q: What Sydney attraction was the venue for the Gay Games VI cultural event titled "Wild Sex"?
A: Toronga Zoo


Wrong, just plain wrong. Then we drew this question:

Q: What is eleven inches long and boosts Harry Potter's popularity with the girls at Hogwatrs?
A: A wand.


The question must be asked "What were they trying to accomplish when the question was written?"

Friday, February 25, 2005

blog redesign

As you can see - I got bored with the look of the site and have decided to give it a make-over. Translation - I've got some stuff I need to finish but I'm procrastinating.

Still have to work out the bugs in some of the stuff - notably the colour in post titles. A work in progress you might say.



[Listening to: Rage Against The Machine - Renegades of Funk - Maggies Farm (6:52)]

Monday, February 21, 2005

Anti-Hero Syndrome

I'd like to preface this screed by saying that I started writing it over eight months ago, and have added to it incrementally since then. Consequently this article may be somewhat lacking in coherence & structure, but I feel the underlying message is clear. So rather than junk it or re-write the piece, I've chosen to post it as is. Enjoy...

One of the hallmarks of good storytelling is the creation of a memorable villain (or villains). Creating that emotional investment on the behalf of the reader/viewer means that they get more out of the story. A side effect of making a villain memorable is that the reader is often left clamoring for their return and the author is left twisting their story's credibility to allow this villainto escape at the end of their story to do so. Giving the readers what they think they want is not always the best thing.

Fiction is littered with such examples. Take Thomas Harris' Hannibal Lector. A memorable, but in the grand scale of the story a relatively minor character in Red Dragon, he really stole the show in The Silence of the Lambs (helped in no small part by Tony Hopkin's performance in the movie adaptation). The public fell in love with this anti-hero and wanted more. And Harris gave it to them with the book Hannibal. Now Hannibal Lecter is an amoral monster - he eats people for crying out loud. Unless you're Brett Easton Ellis, it's rather hard to have the major protagonist of your book a completely unlikable monster. So begins the reform of your bad guy.

Now, eating people is kind of nasty, but it is part of the Cannibal's shtick... so lets sure that most of the people he eats are equally as bad as he is.... say a child molester. While we're giving the fans what they want, let's cater to the real sicko's on the net by having Lecter & Clarice Starling fall in love. Now this is rationalised by Lecter claiming he is fascinated by her intellect & reasoning capabilities. So what's Lecter do the first chance hegets? Brainwashes her & turns her into his mindless f#uck-buddy. Giving the readers what they think they want is not always the best thing.

By the way - think I'm going a bit far with this transformation of Lecter into some kind of hero? Then explain this? But I digress...

The second example of this syndrome is the character Spike of BTVS/Angel fame. Now when this character was first introduced he was supposed to be a brutal bloodthirsty killer who had taken out no less than two slayers (a big deal on this show). Now over the course of his many appearances the show has proceeded to de-claw, de-ball & ultimately destroy the character. It gets so bad that for almost an entire season, he is kept a pseudo- prisonerby the good guys who choose not to destroy him because he's got a chip in his head stopping him from doing bad things.

Keep in mind something here. This isn't a human we're talking about here, it's a monster. It's was a well established fact in the Buffy mythos (at least until Spike came along and the rulebook got thrown out) {mythos?? - god, that sounds wanky reading that}, that when a person is transformed into a vampire, they are taken over by a demon - the person they were is destroyed. So Spike isn't a person - he's a monster. A monster that has killed and tortured countless people just because he could Just because he doesn't look as ugly as most of the monsters doesn't explain the reticence to destroy him for two seasons when he was at their mercy. You know what does - giving in to fanboys and catering to the anti-hero syndrome. Of course, it's also convenient that the only thing that his chip allows him to hit isbad guys - further helping his transformation from cool character to Angel 2.0 replacement. Lame.

Which brings me via a long-winded & convoluted path to what I originally wanted to talk about - the Atticus Kodiak books by Greg Rucka. These books (Keeper, Finder, Smoker, Shooting at Midnight & Critical Space) tell the stories of Kodiak - a Personal Security Agent, or bodyguard, and the people he protects. The first two books I really enjoyed quite a bit. They seem fairly accurate and grounded in reality. When people got shot it tended to really hurt instead of being a minor inconvenience. Perhaps it says something about being a member of the X Files generation that I didn't really blink when it came to the second books plot about a cancelled black ops slush fund.

Book three is where I felt things started to hit the skids. In this book - Smoker - the villain of the piece is a current popular one - Big American Tobacco - who is trying to silence a former employee before hetestifies as to how evil and nasty his former employers were in creating an addictive product. The way they do this is by hiring a professional assassin - in this case one of the Ten - as the name implies one of the ten deadliest assassins in the world. And Atticus is hired to protect the target from these unwanted attentions. Now through good planning, hard work and allot of luck, Atticus & his team manage to protect the target - but it's made perfectly clear that this was by no means an easy job. The book itself is still a good read which I enjoyed. It stays pretty much true to the characters and doesn't stretch its credibility too far (no more than you'd expect in a thriller). The problem lies in the seeds planted for future books in the form of the assassin Atticus & co. fight against - the assassin known as Drama.

Now Drama is a classic poster-child for Anti-Hero Syndrome. She's a cool character with a mysterious, shady past. She's ultra-competent - almost literally able to hand the so-called hero his arse on a number of occasions. And because we're teased by the character and only get the briefest glimpse of who she really is, we're left wanting more. And like so many authors before him, Rucka feels obliged to respond.

We come to the plot of the fifth book - Critical Space (the fourth book being more of a detour into the past history of Kodiak's on again/off again sometimes girlfriend's past - so much a detour that it almost isn't a Kodiak book... but I digress...). So what's the plot of this book? In a nut-shell - because a journalist wrote a book based on the events of the third book, other member's of the Ten decide that Drama has come too close to lifting the lid on the secret underworld they live in - and have decided it's time to rub her out. And Drama's response?Disappear into retirement never to be seen again? Nope. Kill the killers before they get to her? Nope. She instead decides to kidnap the latest person Kodiak has been hired to protect in order to barter the kidnapped person's life in exchange for Atticus's services in protecting Drama. That's right - she wants to hire the guy who protected his previous client through mostly sheer luck and who obviously can't protect his current client - witness the successful kidnapping - because he can somehow protect Drama from another member of the Ten??? Hello??? Excuse me??? This belief is based on what??? That he got lucky once??? What rational reason is there other than "Shit, I've gotta work out away to reintroduce this cool character into my story and I've go no idea how. I know - she can hire him as a bodyguard." What possible purpose can Kodiak serve as a bodyguard? Moving target maybe. But Rucka's already demonstrated on multiple occasions that Drama is more skillful, better equipped, better trained and generally a superior athlete. I'm stumped as well...

Leaving aside the basic idea that practically there's no real purpose behind hiring Kodiak as a bodyguard, let's look at the second problem - Drama is a monster. She takes money - sums in the seven figure range - to kill people - quite successfully I might add. She has no qualms about doing so, and doesn't worry about why she's doing this or for what purpose the killing is for. Heck - Atticus himself states on a number of occasions that she's a monster. Yet at the end of the day he agrees to help her - even though he's coerced; even though she's a killer. Seems crazy right? Even Kodiak's own friends point out this discrepancy to him. And yet he ignores them and goes along with this.

And that is my problem with anti-hero syndrome. If you're going to make the bad guy (or gal) out to be a monster, then there has to be some kind of come-uppance to them. If the Hero is in the situationto finish off, or defeat of capture, or punish the bad guy, then that is what the Hero is suppose to do if they are going to stay the hero. Otherwise, the Hero has sold-out all for the sake of keeping the cool anti-hero. Joss Whedon (or more precisely Marti Noxon- the twit who ruined ran Season 06/07 of BtVS) did it. Thomas Harris did it. And Greg Rucka did it.

Of course, that could just be my misguided opinion..
[Listening to: Gomez - In Our Gun - Ballad Of Nice & Easy (2:51)]

Hunter Thompson commits suicide

DenverPost.com - LOCAL NEWS - sad.

Sunday, February 20, 2005

Hi, My name is Grant and I have a problem.

Can you get enough dice? Well, I can't.

You have to have enough so that when they get cursed and start rolling bad you can place them back in the dice-box-of-decursing and restrive a fresh die. ;~]

Today I was searching around on the net for the dice manufacturers web sites when I stumbled upon Crystal Caste Dice.

So what? Another dice manufacturer. Well, no. THIS MOB IS NUTS!

Crystal Caste have a variety of product lines (click the titles for complete listings):

Crystal Dice
These are elongcated instead of the traditional polyhedral dice.

Dwarven Metal
Cast from Steel, Copper or Brass.

Dwarven Stones
These are actually made of stone, eg: Obsidian, Quartz, Red Jasper, Yellow Jade, Hematite, Synthetic Opal, etc...
Some are actually insane. Silver or Gold-Plated Silver.
Or weird: Bone, yes actual Bone (so they claim).

Then there is the Extroadinary Dwarven Stones
These are the rare and completely nuts dice:
      Meteorite Dwarven Stones
      Dinosaur Dwarven Stones
      Green Jade Dwarven Stones
      Tiger Eye Dwarven Stones

Don't forget the Dice Jewellery. Especially your D20 Pendants and Earrings in varying Stone, Bone and Metal.

And what dice nut would be complete without Solid or Stackable, stone Icehouse Pyramids

Now I am all for ridiculous amounts of dice (multi-tiered tackle-box-style cases full), and the stone ones are cool but impractical (you are just gonna screw up a wooden table), the bone ones are funky but no way would i be buying pendants, earrings, "icehouse pramids" or dice carved from meteorites or fossilised dinosaur bones.

The Five-Billion-Star Hotel

Need to get away from it all? Popular Science presents an exclusive tour of CSS Skywalker, an orbital resort that’s a lot closer to reality than you might think.
Click here for the article

Saturday, February 19, 2005

Lost

Cool show.

I heard that someone has access to the next two shows if people want to watch...

Friday, February 11, 2005

Historical Precedent

All this carping on about Charles and Camilla getting married does make me wonder one thing. Wasn't the whole point of starting your own religion so that the King could marry whomever the heck he wanted?
[Listening to: Rancid - Chef Aid - The South Park Album - Brad Logan (2:16)]

Thursday, February 10, 2005

Strange...

...how a person who's been dead for seven years can have a song at number 36 in the 2005 Triple J Hottest 100...
[Listening to: Rammstein - Live at the Maxx - Du riechst so gut (5:01)]

Do as I say, not as I have done.

I was watching the news today and saw an article where the United States, France and England have told the Iranians to stop their nuclear program to create atomic weapons.

Thats right, spearheaded by the nation with the largest Nuclear Arsenal known to mankind is saying do as I say, not as I have done.

Well, while watching an episode of The West Wing recently, the US President met with the Iranian Prime Minister to tell him to stop building nukes. The interesting part is that the character of the Iranian PM said something to the effect of: "If the US had it their way, there would be only one nuclear power. The US."

How very f*cking true. The US were the first to create nuclear weaponry, the only nation to use them and have created the largest stockpile.

Well you stupid wankers, you created them for defence, now you expect the rest of the world to just let you be the only ones with them. Get F*cked.

Wednesday, February 09, 2005

Death of Hubble

NASA budget would kill Hubble
With the moon on its horizon, NASA sees a slight increase in the budget proposed by President Bush on Monday, but it's not enough to save the Hubble Space Telescope.

Only $93 million in the space agency's $16.45 billion budget would go toward Hubble's survival: $75 million to develop a kamikaze robot that would steer the orbiting observatory into the ocean at the end of its lifetime, and $18 million to try to eke out as much scientific observing time as possible from the telescope through clever remote controlling.

No money is in the budget to send either a robotic repairman or shuttle astronauts to Hubble to extend its lifetime, a decision that is sure to anger astronomers and members of Congress.
...

More Here
[Listening to: Space Man - Babylon Zoo - (5:41)]

Tuesday, February 08, 2005

When it rains...

So...I have been looking for work now since about April of 2004...I have applied for several hundreds of positions over the last months. After way too many immediate knockbacks and too many interviews for me to count I end up with, not one, but TWO JOB OFFERS!.

Needless to say that I have accepted one of them.

I am now a Software Developer for Multinail, Manufacturers and Suppliers of Quality Metal Connectors, Machinery, Software and Engineering for the Pre-Fabricated Timber Truss Industry, working on the Factory Management System

Be afraid


[Listening to: Killing Heidi - Reflector - A Jar Labelled Small (4:25)]

Monday, February 07, 2005

Damn....

Reviews of Alone in the Dark.

From Slant Magazine

"Saying Uwe Boll's Alone in the Dark is better than his 2003 American debut House of the Dead is akin to praising syphilis for not being HIV."

From the Atlanta Journal-Constitution

"Alone in the Dark co-stars perpetual party-girl Tara Reid as an archeologist. That alone should give you some clue as to how bad this movie is."

Yes - that Tara Reid.

The one who didn't notice when her dress fell off in front of a whole bunch of photographers...
[Listening to: Green Day - Dookie - Emenius sleepus (1:44)]

It's been a long time...

First, there was Magical Trevor. Everyone loves Magical Trevor, 'cos the tricks that he does are ever so clever.

Now - see the brilliance of Magical Trevor 2!!! He's back and he's got a new trick - Magical Trevor is ten times as slick as the last time...

Tuesday, February 01, 2005